The Stats
There was an end of season meeting held a few weeks ago in
Haverfordwest Cricket Club where a few issues were discussed ahead of more
winter tinkering.
Discipline was one issue and one that resulted in the
biggest debate of the night. Without going into too much detail the thought is
that discipline on our cricket fields is getting worse.
Every season we hear of someone getting banned, this year
two players from the same club were given an enforced break after separate
incidences led to them getting hauled in front of the county’s disciplinary
panel.
Having been there myself last year (in a supporting role I
hasten to add not as a suspect) it’s not that nice an experience. One Saturday
you are sat talking merrily about the game with members of the said panel and
the next their eyes are fixed upon you looking for chinks in your armour in
order to spot if you are telling the truth or not. It’s a waste of a Sunday
afternoon too in my eyes and all for a silly spat on the pitch playing what is
usually classed as the gentleman’s game.
Anyway, the upshot of it is this. During the winter the
umpires and other senior officials are going to devise a set of scores in which
to rank offences and bowlers giving batsmen the send-off may be one of them.
In fact, it’s believed the send-off is one of the leading
instigators of ill-discipline.
You know what it’s like, you’re at the crease batting away
when all of a sudden the death rattle rings behind you, you feel like crap
having lost your wicket and the bowler laughs in your face, maybe points to the
changing rooms or tells you where to go in hushed or stronger tones.
This leads the batsman to lash out with his bat, tell the bowler
his mother is a minger and proceeds to smack him around the buttocks with his
prized blade before all hell breaks loose.
Of course, that’s an exaggeration but it’s not beyond the
realms of possibility that it could happen.
Let’s hope it doesn’t, you have been warned.
Speaking of bowlers, who took the most wickets in division
one last season and who scored the most runs? At the meeting Paul Webb handed
out the top twenty in each discipline and the usual suspects where there for
all to see, some even made both lists, so here they are.
Top Batsmen
Name
|
Runs
|
Innings
|
Best Score
|
Not out
|
Completed Innings
|
Aver
|
50
|
100
|
Simon Holliday
|
661
|
17
|
67 n.o.
|
6
|
11
|
60.09
|
7
|
0
|
Peter Bradshaw
|
539
|
17
|
97
|
1
|
16
|
33.68
|
5
|
0
|
Phil Williams
|
512
|
15
|
122n.o.
|
1
|
14
|
36.57
|
1
|
1
|
Nick Scourfield
|
491
|
14
|
74
|
3
|
11
|
44.63
|
5
|
0
|
Gareth Davies
|
457
|
12
|
108
|
0
|
12
|
38.08
|
3
|
1
|
Jon Thomas
|
448
|
11
|
111
|
4
|
7
|
64
|
1
|
2
|
Ashley Sutton
|
434
|
14
|
107.n.o
|
3
|
11
|
39.45
|
1
|
1
|
Simon Cole
|
431
|
14
|
66
|
2
|
12
|
35.91
|
2
|
0
|
Jack Jones
|
420
|
16
|
85
|
5
|
11
|
38.18
|
1
|
0
|
Dan Howells
|
418
|
18
|
93
|
2
|
16
|
26.12
|
2
|
0
|
Marc Hughes
|
398
|
15
|
70
|
0
|
15
|
26.53
|
2
|
0
|
Brad Jenkins
|
396
|
13
|
90
|
4
|
9
|
44
|
5
|
0
|
Andrew Cole
|
395
|
16
|
70
|
0
|
16
|
24.68
|
1
|
0
|
Matthew Morgan
|
382
|
16
|
75
|
2
|
14
|
27.28
|
3
|
0
|
Steve Lewis
|
380
|
15
|
80
|
1
|
14
|
27.14
|
4
|
0
|
Paul Davies
|
375
|
14
|
100 n.o.
|
1
|
13
|
28.84
|
0
|
1
|
Phil Cockburn
|
353
|
15
|
64 n.o.
|
4
|
11
|
32.09
|
2
|
0
|
Ian Sefton
|
334
|
8
|
94
|
2
|
6
|
55.66
|
3
|
0
|
Simon Wood
|
333
|
11
|
70n.o.
|
2
|
9
|
37
|
2
|
0
|
So Simon Holliday wins, or does he?
He may have scored the most runs but is his average the
best? Nope, that accolade goes to Jonathan Thomas from Whitland with Holliday
in second and Ian Sefton in third.
Name
|
Runs
|
Innings
|
Best Score
|
Not out
|
Completed Innings
|
Aver
|
50
|
100
|
Jon Thomas
|
448
|
11
|
111
|
4
|
7
|
64
|
1
|
2
|
Simon Holliday
|
661
|
17
|
67 n.o.
|
6
|
11
|
60.09
|
7
|
0
|
Ian Sefton
|
334
|
8
|
94
|
2
|
6
|
55.66
|
3
|
0
|
Nick Scourfield
|
491
|
14
|
74
|
3
|
11
|
44.63
|
5
|
0
|
Brad Jenkins
|
396
|
13
|
90
|
4
|
9
|
44
|
5
|
0
|
Ashley Sutton
|
434
|
14
|
107.n.o
|
3
|
11
|
39.45
|
1
|
1
|
Jack Jones
|
420
|
16
|
85
|
5
|
11
|
38.18
|
1
|
0
|
Gareth Davies
|
457
|
12
|
108
|
0
|
12
|
38.08
|
3
|
1
|
Simon Wood
|
333
|
11
|
70n.o.
|
2
|
9
|
37
|
2
|
0
|
Phil Williams
|
512
|
15
|
122n.o.
|
1
|
14
|
36.57
|
1
|
1
|
Simon Cole
|
431
|
14
|
66
|
2
|
12
|
35.91
|
2
|
0
|
Peter Bradshaw
|
539
|
17
|
97
|
1
|
16
|
33.68
|
5
|
0
|
Phil Cockburn
|
353
|
15
|
64 n.o.
|
4
|
11
|
32.09
|
2
|
0
|
Paul Davies
|
375
|
14
|
100 n.o.
|
1
|
13
|
28.84
|
0
|
1
|
Matthew Morgan
|
382
|
16
|
75
|
2
|
14
|
27.28
|
3
|
0
|
Steve Lewis
|
380
|
15
|
80
|
1
|
14
|
27.14
|
4
|
0
|
Marc Hughes
|
398
|
15
|
70
|
0
|
15
|
26.53
|
2
|
0
|
Dan Howells
|
418
|
18
|
93
|
2
|
16
|
26.12
|
2
|
0
|
Andrew Cole
|
395
|
16
|
70
|
0
|
16
|
24.68
|
1
|
0
|
We all know that averages are calculated by the amount of
runs you score divided by the number of times you are out but are they really a
true reflection of your worth as a batsman? If they were calculated by dividing
by every time you bat, would we then have a better idea of who is the county’s
finest?
Food for thought maybe but Ian Sefton could be classed as
the county’s best with this method as the table below shows.
Name
|
Runs
|
Innings
|
Ave per innings
|
Ian Sefton
|
334
|
8
|
41.75
|
Jon Thomas
|
448
|
11
|
40.72
|
Simon Holliday
|
661
|
17
|
38.88
|
Gareth Davies
|
457
|
12
|
38.08
|
Nick Scourfield
|
491
|
14
|
35.07
|
Phil Williams
|
512
|
15
|
34.13
|
Peter Bradshaw
|
539
|
17
|
31.70
|
Ashley Sutton
|
434
|
14
|
31
|
Simon Cole
|
431
|
14
|
30.78
|
Brad Jenkins
|
396
|
13
|
30.46
|
Simon Wood
|
333
|
11
|
30.27
|
Paul Davies
|
375
|
14
|
26.78
|
Marc Hughes
|
398
|
15
|
26.53
|
Jack Jones
|
420
|
16
|
26.25
|
Steve Lewis
|
380
|
15
|
25.33
|
Andrew Cole
|
395
|
16
|
24.68
|
Matthew Morgan
|
382
|
16
|
23.875
|
Phil Cockburn
|
353
|
15
|
23.53
|
Dan Howells
|
418
|
18
|
23.22
|
Top Bowlers
Take a bow Adam James of Haverfordwest , 45 wickets with
Neyland’s Nathan Banner in second.
Name
|
Overs
|
Maidens
|
Runs
|
Wickets
|
Average
|
Adam James
|
156.3
|
30
|
587
|
47
|
12.48
|
Nathan Banner
|
149.2
|
41
|
394
|
35
|
11.25
|
Andrew Pawlett
|
138.3
|
18
|
433
|
31
|
13.96
|
Dan James
|
150
|
23
|
544
|
28
|
19.42
|
Tom Murphy
|
123.5
|
18
|
438
|
28
|
15.64
|
Henry Durrant
|
125.1
|
31
|
355
|
27
|
13.14
|
Clive Tucker
|
132.4
|
25
|
508
|
27
|
18.81
|
Stefan Jenkins
|
119
|
13
|
554
|
26
|
21.3
|
Andrew Williams
|
93
|
6
|
316
|
25
|
12.64
|
Luke Jones
|
161.3
|
27
|
602
|
25
|
24.08
|
Simon Holliday
|
73.1
|
6
|
304
|
24
|
12.66
|
Rob Williams
|
151.1
|
26
|
478
|
24
|
19.91
|
Gareth Davies
|
113.1
|
18
|
378
|
24
|
15.75
|
Ian Hughes
|
142.4
|
38
|
462
|
23
|
20.18
|
Mark Lee
|
142.1
|
35
|
425
|
23
|
18.47
|
Rhys Davies
|
143.5
|
21
|
521
|
22
|
23.68
|
Matthew Bennett
|
162.3
|
31
|
603
|
22
|
27.4
|
Nick Kooman
|
84.5
|
20
|
285
|
22
|
12.95
|
Tom Davies
|
91.5
|
15
|
399
|
20
|
19.95
|
But Banner can lay a claim to having the best average with a
wicket costing a shade over 11 runs apiece.
Name
|
Overs
|
Maidens
|
Runs
|
Wickets
|
Average
|
Nathan Banner
|
149.2
|
41
|
394
|
35
|
11.25
|
Adam James
|
156.3
|
30
|
587
|
47
|
12.48
|
Andrew Williams
|
93
|
6
|
316
|
25
|
12.64
|
Simon Holliday
|
73.1
|
6
|
304
|
24
|
12.66
|
Nick Kooman
|
84.5
|
20
|
285
|
22
|
12.95
|
Henry Durrant
|
125.1
|
31
|
355
|
27
|
13.14
|
Andrew Pawlett
|
138.3
|
18
|
433
|
31
|
13.96
|
Tom Murphy
|
123.5
|
18
|
438
|
28
|
15.64
|
Gareth Davies
|
113.1
|
18
|
378
|
24
|
15.75
|
Mark Lee
|
142.1
|
35
|
425
|
23
|
18.47
|
Clive Tucker
|
132.4
|
25
|
508
|
27
|
18.81
|
Dan James
|
150
|
23
|
544
|
28
|
19.42
|
Rob Williams
|
151.1
|
26
|
478
|
24
|
19.91
|
Tom Davies
|
91.5
|
15
|
399
|
20
|
19.95
|
Ian Hughes
|
142.4
|
38
|
462
|
23
|
20.18
|
Stefan Jenkins
|
119
|
13
|
554
|
26
|
21.3
|
Rhys Davies
|
143.5
|
21
|
521
|
22
|
23.68
|
Luke Jones
|
161.3
|
27
|
602
|
25
|
24.08
|
Matthew Bennett
|
162.3
|
31
|
603
|
22
|
27.4
|
But is his strike rate the best. Does he snare victims
quicker than anyone else or does James win that one instead?
Well, neither do as Doc Holliday sneaks in with his left arm
loopers with Town team mate James in
second and Banner moving down to fifth behind his team mate Nick Koomen.
Name
|
Overs
|
Balls bowled
|
wkts
|
strike rate
|
Simon Holliday
|
73.1
|
439
|
24
|
18.29
|
Adam James
|
156.3
|
939
|
47
|
19.98
|
Andrew Williams
|
93
|
558
|
25
|
22.32
|
Nick Kooman
|
84.5
|
507
|
22
|
23.05
|
Nathan Banner
|
149.2
|
896
|
35
|
25.60
|
Tom Murphy
|
123.5
|
743
|
28
|
26.54
|
Andrew Pawlett
|
138.3
|
831
|
31
|
26.81
|
Stefan Jenkins
|
119
|
714
|
26
|
27.46
|
Tom Davies
|
91.5
|
551
|
20
|
27.55
|
Henry Durrant
|
125.1
|
751
|
27
|
27.81
|
Gareth Davies
|
113.1
|
679
|
24
|
28.29
|
Clive Tucker
|
132.4
|
796
|
27
|
29.48
|
Dan James
|
150
|
900
|
28
|
32.14
|
Mark Lee
|
142.1
|
853
|
23
|
37.09
|
Ian Hughes
|
142.4
|
856
|
23
|
37.22
|
Rob Williams
|
151.1
|
907
|
24
|
37.79
|
Luke Jones
|
161.3
|
969
|
25
|
38.76
|
Rhys Davies
|
143.5
|
863
|
22
|
39.23
|
Matthew Bennett
|
162.3
|
975
|
22
|
44.32
|
So the strike rate is impressive but how many overs on
average does it take for the top twenty to take a pole?
Name
|
Overs
|
Wickets
|
Overs per wicket
|
Simon Holliday
|
73.1
|
24
|
3.0
|
Adam James
|
156.3
|
47
|
3.3
|
Andrew Williams
|
93
|
25
|
3.7
|
Nick Kooman
|
84.5
|
22
|
3.8
|
Nathan Banner
|
149.2
|
35
|
4.3
|
Tom Murphy
|
123.5
|
28
|
4.4
|
Andrew Pawlett
|
138.3
|
31
|
4.5
|
Tom Davies
|
91.5
|
20
|
4.6
|
Stefan Jenkins
|
119
|
26
|
4.6
|
Henry Durrant
|
125.1
|
27
|
4.6
|
Gareth Davies
|
113.1
|
24
|
4.7
|
Clive Tucker
|
132.4
|
27
|
4.9
|
Dan James
|
150
|
28
|
5.4
|
Mark Lee
|
142.1
|
23
|
6.2
|
Ian Hughes
|
142.4
|
23
|
6.2
|
Rob Williams
|
151.1
|
24
|
6.3
|
Luke Jones
|
161.3
|
25
|
6.5
|
Rhys Davies
|
143.5
|
22
|
6.5
|
Matthew Bennett
|
162.3
|
22
|
7.4
|
Name not on the list? Want it to be? Then get in the nets
this winter or play indoor cricket as even if your club doesn’t enter there was
talk in the meeting of allowing teams to field guest players in order to get
the fixtures played.
No decision on that just yet but they may be in due course.
Stay tuned for any updates.
Comments
Post a Comment